Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
172.5 kcal
Score
56 / 100
Belen tava has a higher nutrition quality score (56) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
125 vs 172.5(+38.0%)
Score Diff
26 vs 56(+115.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Belen tava
Higher energy
Belen tava
Score leader
Belen tava
Nutrient split
6 - 13 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Analı kızlı and Belen tava are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Analı kızlı has 125.0 kcal and Belen tava has 172.5 kcal. The difference is 47.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 56. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Analı kızlı | Belen tava | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 28 µg | 0.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.11 mg | 0.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 1.1 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.18 mg | +125.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | 0.24 mg | +71.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.6 mg | 12 mg | +361.5% |
| Demir | 1.45 mg | 1.8 mg | +24.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 0.8 g | -65.2% |
| Fosfor | 78 mg | 135 mg | +73.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 15 mg | -37.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.2 g | 2.8 g | -80.3% |
| Kolesterol | 12 mg | 45 mg | +275.0% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 26 mg | 21 mg | -19.2% |
| Niasin | 1.65 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 220 mg | 260 mg | +18.2% |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 14.2 g | +153.6% |
| Sodyum | 325 mg | 280 mg | -13.8% |
| Su | 76.2 g | 68.2 g | -10.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.75 g | 5.2 g | +197.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 34 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.15 g | 4.8 g | +123.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.1 g | 12.1 g | +137.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.82 g | 0.9 g | +9.8% |
| Çinko | 1.12 mg | 2.9 mg | +158.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Analı kızlı and Belen tava.
Analı kızlı has less energy per 100 g (125 kcal versus 172.5 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Analı kızlı has 2.6 mg and Belen tava has 12 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Analı kızlı 26, Belen tava 56.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.