Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
60 kcal
Score
97 / 100
Analı kızlı has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
125 vs 60(-52.0%)
Score Diff
100 vs 97(-3.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Analı kızlı
Higher energy
Analı kızlı
Score leader
Analı kızlı
Nutrient split
17 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Analı kızlı and Arabaşı Çorbası are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Analı kızlı has 125.0 kcal and Arabaşı Çorbası has 60.0 kcal. The difference is 65.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 100 and 97. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Analı kızlı | Arabaşı Çorbası | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 28 µg | 26.5 µg | -5.4% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.18 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | 0.11 mg | -21.4% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 145 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.6 mg | 2.8 mg | +7.7% |
| Demir | 1.45 mg | 0.65 mg | -55.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.3 g | 0.45 g | -80.4% |
| Enerji | — | 251 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 60 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 78 mg | 48 mg | -38.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 14.2 mg | -40.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.2 g | 4.6 g | -67.6% |
| Kolesterol | 12 mg | 12.4 mg | +3.3% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.15 g | -4.2% |
| Magnezyum | 26 mg | 9.5 mg | -63.5% |
| Niasin | 1.65 mg | 1.75 mg | +6.1% |
| Potasyum | 220 mg | 128 mg | -41.8% |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 4.3 g | -23.2% |
| Selenyum | — | 5.8 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 325 mg | 375 mg | +15.4% |
| Su | 76.2 g | 86.8 g | +13.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.75 g | 0.88 g | -49.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 34 µg | 8.4 µg | -75.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.15 g | 1.15 g | -46.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 5.1 g | 2.7 g | -47.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.82 g | 0.52 g | -36.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.55 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.12 mg | 0.54 mg | -51.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Analı kızlı and Arabaşı Çorbası.
Arabaşı Çorbası has less energy per 100 g (60 kcal versus 125 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Analı kızlı has 2.3 g and Arabaşı Çorbası has 0.45 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Analı kızlı 100, Arabaşı Çorbası 97.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.