Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
337 kcal
Score
66 / 100
Yıldız anason tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (66) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
691 vs 337(-51.2%)
Score Diff
14 vs 66(+371.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yıldız anason tohumu
Higher energy
Amerikan cevizi
Score leader
Yıldız anason tohumu
Nutrient split
3 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amerikan cevizi and Yıldız anason tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amerikan cevizi has 691.0 kcal and Yıldız anason tohumu has 337.0 kcal. The difference is 354.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amerikan cevizi | Yıldız anason tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 311 iu | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.66 mg | 0.34 mg | -48.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.13 mg | 0.29 mg | +123.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.21 mg | 0.65 mg | +209.5% |
| Bakir | — | 0.91 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.1 mg | 21 mg | +1809.1% |
| Demir | 2.53 mg | 36.96 mg | +1360.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 9.6 g | 14.6 g | +52.1% |
| Fosfor | 277 mg | 440 mg | +58.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 70 mg | 646 mg | +822.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.86 g | 50 g | +260.8% |
| Magnezyum | 121 mg | 170 mg | +40.5% |
| Mangan | — | 2.3 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.17 mg | 3.06 mg | +161.5% |
| Potasyum | 410 mg | 1441 mg | +251.5% |
| Protein | 9.17 g | 17.6 g | +91.9% |
| Sodyum | — | 16 mg | — |
| Su | 3.52 g | 9.54 g | +171.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.18 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 22 µg | 10 µg | -54.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 40.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 71.97 g | 15.9 g | -77.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 21.6 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 3.97 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.53 mg | 5.3 mg | +17.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amerikan cevizi and Yıldız anason tohumu.
Yıldız anason tohumu has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 691 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Amerikan cevizi has 1.1 mg and Yıldız anason tohumu has 21 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amerikan cevizi 14, Yıldız anason tohumu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.