Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
45 kcal
Score
50 / 100
Amchur has a higher nutrition quality score (55) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
324.2 vs 45(-86.1%)
Score Diff
55 vs 50(-9.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amchur
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Amchur
Nutrient split
12 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amchur and Wakame yosunu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amchur has 324.2 kcal and Wakame yosunu has 45.0 kcal. The difference is 279.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 55 and 50. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amchur | Wakame yosunu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 22 µg | 18 µg | -18.2% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.06 mg | -25.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.23 mg | +155.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.35 mg | 0.28 mg | -20.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 260 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 52 mg | 3 mg | -94.2% |
| Demir | 24.5 mg | 2.18 mg | -91.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.8 g | 0.5 g | -96.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 28 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 75 mg | 80 mg | +6.7% |
| İyot | — | 4200 µg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 5.3 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 180 mg | 150 mg | -16.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 80.2 g | 9.14 g | -88.6% |
| Kül | 5.3 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 82 mg | 107 mg | +30.5% |
| Mangan | — | 1.4 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.4 mg | 1.6 mg | +14.3% |
| Potasyum | 640 mg | 50 mg | -92.2% |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.03 g | -5.3% |
| Sodyum | 35 mg | 872 mg | +2391.4% |
| Su | 9.5 g | 80 g | +742.1% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 196 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.8 g | 0.64 g | -64.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 21.4 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 0.38 mg | -65.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amchur and Wakame yosunu.
Wakame yosunu has less energy per 100 g (45 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Amchur has 35 mg and Wakame yosunu has 872 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amchur 55, Wakame yosunu 50.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.