Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
318 kcal
Score
54 / 100
Amchur has a higher nutrition quality score (55) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
324.2 vs 318(-1.9%)
Score Diff
55 vs 54(-1.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amchur
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Amchur
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amchur and Kuru sumak are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amchur has 324.2 kcal and Kuru sumak has 318.0 kcal. The difference is 6.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 55 and 54. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amchur | Kuru sumak | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 22 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.12 mg | +50.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.22 mg | +144.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | 0.25 mg | +13.6% |
| Bakir | 0.35 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 260 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 52 mg | 39 mg | -25.0% |
| Demir | 24.5 mg | 12.4 mg | -49.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.8 g | 41.5 g | +224.2% |
| Folat DFE | 28 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 75 mg | 105 mg | +40.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 180 mg | 315 mg | +75.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 80.2 g | 68 g | -15.2% |
| Kül | 5.3 g | 5 g | -5.7% |
| Magnezyum | 82 mg | 78 mg | -4.9% |
| Malik asit | — | 1450 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.4 mg | 1.8 mg | +28.6% |
| Potasyum | 640 mg | 920 mg | +43.8% |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 4.8 g | +50.0% |
| Sodyum | 35 mg | 35 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 9.5 g | 8.5 g | -10.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 2.3 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 22 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.3 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.8 g | 10.2 g | +466.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.8 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 21.4 g | 4.2 g | -80.4% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 1.45 mg | +31.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amchur and Kuru sumak.
Kuru sumak has less energy per 100 g (318 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Amchur has 1.8 g and Kuru sumak has 10.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amchur 55, Kuru sumak 54.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.