Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
253 kcal
Score
96 / 100
Kuru dereotu has a higher nutrition quality score (96) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
324.2 vs 253(-22.0%)
Score Diff
55 vs 96(+74.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru dereotu
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Kuru dereotu
Nutrient split
4 - 17 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amchur and Kuru dereotu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amchur has 324.2 kcal and Kuru dereotu has 253.0 kcal. The difference is 71.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 55 and 96. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amchur | Kuru dereotu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 22 µg | 293 µg | +1231.8% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.42 mg | +425.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.28 mg | +211.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | 0.63 mg | +186.4% |
| Bakir | 0.35 mg | 0.14 mg | -60.0% |
| Beta Karoten | 260 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 52 mg | 50 mg | -3.8% |
| Demir | 24.5 mg | 48.78 mg | +99.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.8 g | 13.6 g | +6.2% |
| Folat DFE | 28 µg | 274 µg | +878.6% |
| Fosfor | 75 mg | 543 mg | +624.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 180 mg | 1784 mg | +891.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 80.2 g | 55.82 g | -30.4% |
| Kül | 5.3 g | 12.55 g | +136.8% |
| Magnezyum | 82 mg | 256 mg | +212.2% |
| Mangan | — | 1.26 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.4 mg | 2.81 mg | +100.7% |
| Potasyum | 640 mg | 3308 mg | +416.9% |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 19.96 g | +523.8% |
| Sodyum | 35 mg | 208 mg | +494.3% |
| Su | 9.5 g | 7.3 g | -23.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.24 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.87 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.8 g | 4.36 g | +142.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.94 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 21.4 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 3.3 mg | +200.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amchur and Kuru dereotu.
Kuru dereotu has less energy per 100 g (253 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Amchur has 22 µg and Kuru dereotu has 293 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amchur 55, Kuru dereotu 96.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.