Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
263 kcal
Score
59 / 100
Jamaika biberi has a higher nutrition quality score (59) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
324.2 vs 263(-18.9%)
Score Diff
55 vs 59(+7.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Jamaika biberi
Higher energy
Amchur
Score leader
Jamaika biberi
Nutrient split
8 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amchur and Jamaika biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amchur has 324.2 kcal and Jamaika biberi has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 61.2 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 55 and 59. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amchur | Jamaika biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 22 µg | 27 µg | +22.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.1 mg | +25.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.09 mg | 0.06 mg | -33.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.22 mg | 0.21 mg | -4.5% |
| Bakir | 0.35 mg | 0.55 mg | +57.1% |
| Beta Karoten | 260 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 52 mg | 39.2 mg | -24.6% |
| Demir | 24.5 mg | 7.06 mg | -71.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.8 g | 21.6 g | +68.8% |
| Folat DFE | 28 µg | 36 µg | +28.6% |
| Fosfor | 75 mg | 113 mg | +50.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 180 mg | 661 mg | +267.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 80.2 g | 72.12 g | -10.1% |
| Kül | 5.3 g | 4.65 g | -12.3% |
| Magnezyum | 82 mg | 135 mg | +64.6% |
| Mangan | — | 2.94 mg | — |
| Niasin | 1.4 mg | 2.86 mg | +104.3% |
| Potasyum | 640 mg | 1044 mg | +63.1% |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 6.09 g | +90.3% |
| Selenyum | — | 2.7 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 35 mg | 77 mg | +120.0% |
| Su | 9.5 g | 8.46 g | -10.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 2.55 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.66 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.8 g | 8.69 g | +382.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.36 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 21.4 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 1.01 mg | -8.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amchur and Jamaika biberi.
Jamaika biberi has less energy per 100 g (263 kcal versus 324.2 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Amchur has 1.8 g and Jamaika biberi has 8.69 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amchur 55, Jamaika biberi 59.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.