Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
385 kcal
Score
83 / 100
Pirinç patlağı gevreği has a higher nutrition quality score (83) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
386 vs 385(-0.3%)
Score Diff
38 vs 83(+118.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pirinç patlağı gevreği
Higher energy
Amarant unu
Score leader
Pirinç patlağı gevreği
Nutrient split
8 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Amarant unu and Pirinç patlağı gevreği are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Amarant unu has 386.0 kcal and Pirinç patlağı gevreği has 385.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 38 and 83. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Amarant unu | Pirinç patlağı gevreği | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 750 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.116 mg | 1.5 mg | +1193.1% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 6 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 1.7 mg | +750.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.587 mg | 2 mg | +240.7% |
| Bakir | 0.525 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 60 mg | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 333 iu | — |
| Demir | 7.61 mg | 28 mg | +267.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 1.5 g | -77.6% |
| Folat DFE | 49 µg | 667 µg | +1261.2% |
| Fosfor | 557 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 159 mg | 5 mg | -96.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 66.17 g | 89 g | +34.5% |
| Kül | 2.48 g | 1.6 g | -35.5% |
| Magnezyum | 248 mg | 25 mg | -89.9% |
| Mangan | 3.33 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.923 mg | 20 mg | +2066.8% |
| Potasyum | 508 mg | 110 mg | -78.3% |
| Protein | 14.45 g | 6.3 g | -56.4% |
| Sodyum | 21 mg | 520 mg | +2376.2% |
| Su | 11.1 g | 2 g | -82.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.46 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.69 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.51 g | 1.1 g | -83.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.78 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.7 g | 9.2 g | +441.2% |
| Çinko | 2.87 mg | 15 mg | +422.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Amarant unu and Pirinç patlağı gevreği.
Pirinç patlağı gevreği has less energy per 100 g (385 kcal versus 386 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Amarant unu has 21 mg and Pirinç patlağı gevreği has 520 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Amarant unu 38, Pirinç patlağı gevreği 83.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.