Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
441 kcal
Score
50 / 100
Soya unu has a higher nutrition quality score (50) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
368 vs 441(+19.8%)
Score Diff
32 vs 50(+56.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Soya unu
Higher energy
Soya unu
Score leader
Soya unu
Nutrient split
3 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın kinoa and Soya unu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal and Soya unu has 441.0 kcal. The difference is 73.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 50. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın kinoa | Soya unu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 0.7 mg | +94.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.25 mg | -21.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.49 mg | 0.57 mg | +16.3% |
| Bakir | 0.59 mg | 2.4 mg | +306.8% |
| Demir | 4.57 mg | 6.4 mg | +40.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 9.6 g | +37.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.44 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 368 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 305 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 457 mg | 589 mg | +28.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 210 mg | +346.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.16 g | 31.9 g | -50.3% |
| Kül | — | 4.9 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 197 mg | 429 mg | +117.8% |
| Mangan | 2 mg | 3 mg | +50.0% |
| Niasin | 1.52 mg | 2.6 mg | +71.1% |
| Potasyum | 563 mg | 2510 mg | +345.8% |
| Protein | 14.12 g | 37.8 g | +167.7% |
| Selenyum | 8.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 13 mg | +160.0% |
| Su | 13.28 g | 5.3 g | -60.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 3 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | 184 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.07 g | 20.6 g | +239.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 3.9 mg | +25.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın kinoa and Soya unu.
Altın kinoa has less energy per 100 g (368 kcal versus 441 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Altın kinoa has 47 mg and Soya unu has 210 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın kinoa 32, Soya unu 50.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.