Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
341 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Siyah Kuru Fasulye has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
368 vs 341(-7.3%)
Score Diff
32 vs 41(+28.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Siyah Kuru Fasulye
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Siyah Kuru Fasulye
Nutrient split
9 - 10 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın kinoa and Siyah Kuru Fasulye are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal and Siyah Kuru Fasulye has 341.0 kcal. The difference is 27.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın kinoa | Siyah Kuru Fasulye | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 0.9 mg | +150.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.193 mg | -39.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.49 mg | 0.399 mg | -18.6% |
| Bakir | 0.59 mg | 0.841 mg | +42.5% |
| Demir | 4.57 mg | 5.02 mg | +9.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 15.5 g | +121.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.44 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 368 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 444 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 457 mg | 352 mg | -23.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 160 mg | +240.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.16 g | 62.36 g | -2.8% |
| Kül | — | 3.6 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 197 mg | 171 mg | -13.2% |
| Mangan | 2 mg | 1.06 mg | -47.0% |
| Niasin | 1.52 mg | 1.955 mg | +28.6% |
| Potasyum | 563 mg | 1483 mg | +163.4% |
| Protein | 14.12 g | 21.6 g | +53.0% |
| Selenyum | 8.5 µg | 3.2 µg | -62.4% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 5 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 13.28 g | 11.02 g | -17.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 184 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.07 g | 1.42 g | -76.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.1 g | 2.12 g | +2020.0% |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 3.65 mg | +17.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın kinoa and Siyah Kuru Fasulye.
Siyah Kuru Fasulye has less energy per 100 g (341 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Altın kinoa has 0.1 g and Siyah Kuru Fasulye has 2.12 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın kinoa 32, Siyah Kuru Fasulye 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.