Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
385 kcal
Score
83 / 100
Pirinç patlağı gevreği has a higher nutrition quality score (83) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
368 vs 385(+4.6%)
Score Diff
32 vs 83(+159.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pirinç patlağı gevreği
Higher energy
Pirinç patlağı gevreği
Score leader
Pirinç patlağı gevreği
Nutrient split
7 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın kinoa and Pirinç patlağı gevreği are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal and Pirinç patlağı gevreği has 385.0 kcal. The difference is 17.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 83. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın kinoa | Pirinç patlağı gevreği | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 750 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 1.5 mg | +316.7% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 6 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 1.7 mg | +431.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.49 mg | 2 mg | +308.2% |
| Bakir | 0.59 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 60 mg | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 333 iu | — |
| Demir | 4.57 mg | 28 mg | +512.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 1.5 g | -78.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.44 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 368 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 667 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 457 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 5 mg | -89.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.16 g | 89 g | +38.7% |
| Kül | — | 1.6 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 197 mg | 25 mg | -87.3% |
| Mangan | 2 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.52 mg | 20 mg | +1215.8% |
| Potasyum | 563 mg | 110 mg | -80.5% |
| Protein | 14.12 g | 6.3 g | -55.4% |
| Selenyum | 8.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 520 mg | +10300.0% |
| Su | 13.28 g | 2 g | -84.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 184 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.07 g | 1.1 g | -81.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.1 g | 9.2 g | +9100.0% |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 15 mg | +383.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın kinoa and Pirinç patlağı gevreği.
Altın kinoa has less energy per 100 g (368 kcal versus 385 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Altın kinoa has 5 mg and Pirinç patlağı gevreği has 520 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın kinoa 32, Pirinç patlağı gevreği 83.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.