Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
116 kcal
Score
37 / 100
Kara mercimek has a higher nutrition quality score (37) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
368 vs 116(-68.5%)
Score Diff
32 vs 37(+15.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kara mercimek
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Kara mercimek
Nutrient split
16 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın kinoa and Kara mercimek are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal and Kara mercimek has 116.0 kcal. The difference is 252.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 37. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın kinoa | Kara mercimek | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 0.198 mg | -45.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.32 mg | 0.059 mg | -81.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.49 mg | 0.177 mg | -63.9% |
| Bakir | 0.59 mg | 0.254 mg | -56.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 0.5 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.57 mg | 2.51 mg | -45.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 7.9 g | +12.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.44 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 368 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 181 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 457 mg | 180 mg | -60.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 4.7 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 47 mg | 19 mg | -59.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 64.16 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 20.13 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 197 mg | 36 mg | -81.7% |
| Mangan | 2 mg | 0.306 mg | -84.7% |
| Niasin | 1.52 mg | 0.612 mg | -59.7% |
| Potasyum | 563 mg | 369 mg | -34.5% |
| Protein | 14.12 g | 9.02 g | -36.1% |
| Selenyum | 8.5 µg | 0.8 µg | -90.6% |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 2 mg | -60.0% |
| Su | 13.28 g | 75.3 g | +467.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 184 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.07 g | 0.38 g | -93.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 1 mg | -67.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın kinoa and Kara mercimek.
Kara mercimek has less energy per 100 g (116 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Su, Altın kinoa has 13.28 g and Kara mercimek has 75.3 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın kinoa 32, Kara mercimek 37.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.