Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
59 kcal
Score
17 / 100
Alphonse üzümü has a higher nutrition quality score (18) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
69 vs 59(-14.5%)
Score Diff
18 vs 17(-5.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alphonse üzümü
Higher energy
Alphonse üzümü
Score leader
Alphonse üzümü
Nutrient split
14 - 4 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alphonse üzümü and Starking elması are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alphonse üzümü has 69.0 kcal and Starking elması has 59.0 kcal. The difference is 10.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 18 and 17. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alphonse üzümü | Starking elması | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 3 µg | 3 µg | 0.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.069 mg | 0.017 mg | -75.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.07 mg | 0.026 mg | -62.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.086 mg | 0.041 mg | -52.3% |
| Bakir | 0.127 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 27 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.2 mg | 4.6 mg | +43.7% |
| Demir | 0.36 mg | 0.12 mg | -66.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.9 g | 2.4 g | +166.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 3 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 20 mg | 11 mg | -45.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 14.6 µg | 2.2 µg | -84.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 10 mg | 6 mg | -40.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 18.1 g | 13.81 g | -23.7% |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 5 mg | -28.6% |
| Mangan | 0.071 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 0.188 mg | 0.091 mg | -51.6% |
| Potasyum | 191 mg | 107 mg | -44.0% |
| Protein | 0.72 g | 0.26 g | -63.9% |
| Sodyum | — | 1 mg | — |
| Su | 80.54 g | 85.56 g | +6.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 2 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.16 g | 0.17 g | +6.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 15.48 g | 10.39 g | -32.9% |
| Çinko | 0.07 mg | 0.04 mg | -42.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alphonse üzümü and Starking elması.
Starking elması has less energy per 100 g (59 kcal versus 69 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Alphonse üzümü has 0.9 g and Starking elması has 2.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alphonse üzümü 18, Starking elması 17.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.