Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
337 kcal
Score
66 / 100
Yıldız anason tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (66) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
629 vs 337(-46.4%)
Score Diff
27 vs 66(+144.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yıldız anason tohumu
Higher energy
Alp fıstığı
Score leader
Yıldız anason tohumu
Nutrient split
7 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alp fıstığı and Yıldız anason tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alp fıstığı has 629.0 kcal and Yıldız anason tohumu has 337.0 kcal. The difference is 292.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alp fıstığı | Yıldız anason tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 311 iu | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.36 mg | 0.34 mg | -5.6% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.23 mg | 0.29 mg | +26.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.65 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.91 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.8 mg | 21 mg | +2525.0% |
| Demir | 5.5 mg | 36.96 mg | +572.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.7 g | 14.6 g | +294.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 9.3 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 34 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 575 mg | 440 mg | -23.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 16 mg | 646 mg | +3937.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 13.1 g | 50 g | +281.7% |
| Magnezyum | 251 mg | 170 mg | -32.3% |
| Mangan | 8.8 mg | 2.3 mg | -73.9% |
| Niasin | 4.3 mg | 3.06 mg | -28.8% |
| Potasyum | 597 mg | 1441 mg | +141.4% |
| Protein | 13.7 g | 17.6 g | +28.5% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 16 mg | +700.0% |
| Su | 5.3 g | 9.54 g | +80.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.9 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 10 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 18.8 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 68.4 g | 15.9 g | -76.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 34.1 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 6.4 mg | 5.3 mg | -17.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alp fıstığı and Yıldız anason tohumu.
Yıldız anason tohumu has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 629 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Alp fıstığı has 16 mg and Yıldız anason tohumu has 646 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alp fıstığı 27, Yıldız anason tohumu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.