Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Aleppo biberi has a higher nutrition quality score (77) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 328.5(+16.5%)
Score Diff
77 vs 73(-5.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Aleppo biberi
Higher energy
İpek Maraş Pul Biberi
Score leader
Aleppo biberi
Nutrient split
5 - 13 (tie: 3)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aleppo biberi and İpek Maraş Pul Biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aleppo biberi has 282.0 kcal and İpek Maraş Pul Biberi has 328.5 kcal. The difference is 46.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 77 and 73. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aleppo biberi | İpek Maraş Pul Biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1480 µg | 1980 µg | +33.8% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.3 mg | 0.32 mg | +6.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.9 mg | 0.95 mg | +5.6% |
| B6 Vitamini | 2.1 mg | 2.15 mg | +2.4% |
| Beta Karoten | 17000 µg | 23760 µg | +39.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 75 mg | 76.4 mg | +1.9% |
| Demir | 14.5 mg | 14.2 mg | -2.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 27.2 g | 27.2 g | 0.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 28 mg | 29.8 mg | +6.4% |
| Folat DFE | — | 53 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 290 mg | 290 mg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 148 mg | 145 mg | -2.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 52 g | 49.5 g | -4.8% |
| Kül | — | 9.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 152 mg | 148 mg | -2.6% |
| Niasin | 8.7 mg | 8.7 mg | 0.0% |
| Potasyum | 1950 mg | 1980 mg | +1.5% |
| Protein | 12 g | 12.3 g | +2.5% |
| Sodyum | 1600 mg | 1820 mg | +13.8% |
| Su | 10.5 g | 14.2 g | +35.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 2.4 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.1 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 10 g | 14.8 g | +48.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 7.3 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 10.3 g | 8.1 g | -21.4% |
| Çinko | 2.4 mg | 2.65 mg | +10.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aleppo biberi and İpek Maraş Pul Biberi.
Aleppo biberi has less energy per 100 g (282 kcal versus 328.5 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Aleppo biberi has 10 g and İpek Maraş Pul Biberi has 14.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aleppo biberi 77, İpek Maraş Pul Biberi 73.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.