Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
96 kcal
Score
40 / 100
Alaska pollock has a higher nutrition quality score (67) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 96(+18.5%)
Score Diff
67 vs 40(-40.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alaska pollock
Higher energy
Tilapia
Score leader
Alaska pollock
Nutrient split
9 - 8 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alaska pollock and Tilapia are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alaska pollock has 81.0 kcal and Tilapia has 96.0 kcal. The difference is 15.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 67 and 40. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alaska pollock | Tilapia | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.046 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 3.1 µg | 1.58 µg | -49.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.106 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 124 iu | — |
| Demir | 0.24 mg | 0.56 mg | +133.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.2 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 184 mg | 170 mg | -7.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 10 mg | 10 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 71 mg | 50 mg | -29.6% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.08 g | -10.0% |
| Magnezyum | 67 mg | 27 mg | -59.7% |
| Niasin | 1.32 mg | 3.9 mg | +195.5% |
| Potasyum | 356 mg | 302 mg | -15.2% |
| Protein | 17.18 g | 20.08 g | +16.9% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 41.8 µg | +14.5% |
| Sodyum | 99 mg | 52 mg | -47.5% |
| Su | 81.18 g | 78.08 g | -3.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.14 g | 0.58 g | +314.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | 0.53 g | +341.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.8 g | 1.7 g | +112.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.34 g | 0.39 g | +14.7% |
| Çinko | 0.46 mg | 0.33 mg | -28.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alaska pollock and Tilapia.
Alaska pollock has less energy per 100 g (81 kcal versus 96 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Alaska pollock has 0.12 g and Tilapia has 0.53 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alaska pollock 67, Tilapia 40.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.