Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
80 kcal
Score
89 / 100
Tatlı su midyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (89) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 80(-1.2%)
Score Diff
67 vs 89(+32.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tatlı su midyesi
Higher energy
Alaska pollock
Score leader
Tatlı su midyesi
Nutrient split
4 - 12 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alaska pollock and Tatlı su midyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alaska pollock has 81.0 kcal and Tatlı su midyesi has 80.0 kcal. The difference is 1.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 67 and 89. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alaska pollock | Tatlı su midyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.046 mg | 0.08 mg | +73.9% |
| B12 Vitamini | 3.1 µg | 12 µg | +287.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.106 mg | 0.18 mg | +69.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 6 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.24 mg | 6.8 mg | +2733.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.2 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 184 mg | 184 mg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 10 mg | 92 mg | +820.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 4.1 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 71 mg | 50 mg | -29.6% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 67 mg | 34 mg | -49.3% |
| Niasin | 1.32 mg | 1.6 mg | +21.2% |
| Potasyum | 356 mg | 268 mg | -24.7% |
| Protein | 17.18 g | 11.9 g | -30.7% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 48.5 µg | +32.9% |
| Sodyum | 99 mg | 240 mg | +142.4% |
| Su | 81.18 g | 81.2 g | +0.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.14 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.8 g | 1.8 g | +125.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.34 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.46 mg | 1.9 mg | +313.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alaska pollock and Tatlı su midyesi.
Tatlı su midyesi has less energy per 100 g (80 kcal versus 81 kcal).
For measured Demir, Alaska pollock has 0.24 mg and Tatlı su midyesi has 6.8 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alaska pollock 67, Tatlı su midyesi 89.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.