Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
165 kcal
Score
55 / 100
Alaska pollock has a higher nutrition quality score (67) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
81 vs 165(+103.7%)
Score Diff
67 vs 55(-17.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alaska pollock
Higher energy
Kuzu İncik
Score leader
Alaska pollock
Nutrient split
6 - 13 (tie: 3)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alaska pollock and Kuzu İncik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alaska pollock has 81.0 kcal and Kuzu İncik has 165.0 kcal. The difference is 84.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 67 and 55. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alaska pollock | Kuzu İncik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.046 mg | 0.11 mg | +139.1% |
| B12 Vitamini | 3.1 µg | 2.45 µg | -21.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.106 mg | 0.24 mg | +126.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.25 mg | 0.42 mg | +68.0% |
| D Vitamini | 1.2 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.24 mg | 1.95 mg | +712.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.2 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 184 mg | 192 mg | +4.3% |
| Kalsiyum | 10 mg | 14 mg | +40.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 71 mg | 71 mg | 0.0% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 67 mg | 22 mg | -67.2% |
| Niasin | 1.32 mg | 6.1 mg | +362.1% |
| Potasyum | 356 mg | 315 mg | -11.5% |
| Protein | 17.18 g | 20.2 g | +17.6% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 26.4 µg | -27.7% |
| Sodyum | 99 mg | 68 mg | -31.3% |
| Su | 81.18 g | 69.5 g | -14.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.14 g | 3.8 g | +2614.3% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 83.5 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | 3.7 g | +2983.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.8 g | 9.2 g | +1050.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.34 g | 0.72 g | +111.8% |
| Çinko | 0.46 mg | 4.52 mg | +882.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alaska pollock and Kuzu İncik.
Alaska pollock has less energy per 100 g (81 kcal versus 165 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Alaska pollock has 0.12 g and Kuzu İncik has 3.7 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alaska pollock 67, Kuzu İncik 55.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.