Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
74 kcal
Score
59 / 100
Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has a higher nutrition quality score (68) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
27 vs 74(+174.1%)
Score Diff
68 vs 59(-13.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alabaş (Kohlrabi)
Higher energy
Lotus Kökü
Score leader
Alabaş (Kohlrabi)
Nutrient split
5 - 16 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alabaş (Kohlrabi) and Lotus Kökü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 27.0 kcal and Lotus Kökü has 74.0 kcal. The difference is 47.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 68 and 59. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
23 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alabaş (Kohlrabi) | Lotus Kökü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.16 mg | +220.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.22 mg | +1000.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.258 mg | +72.0% |
| Bakir | 0.129 mg | 0.257 mg | +99.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 62 mg | 44 mg | -29.0% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 1.16 mg | +190.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.6 g | 4.9 g | +36.1% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 74 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 46 mg | 100 mg | +117.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 45 mg | +87.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.2 g | 17.23 g | +177.9% |
| Kül | 1 g | 0.97 g | -3.0% |
| Magnezyum | 19 mg | 23 mg | +21.1% |
| Mangan | 0.139 mg | 0.261 mg | +87.8% |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.4 mg | 0.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.165 mg | 0.377 mg | +128.5% |
| Potasyum | 350 mg | 556 mg | +58.9% |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 2.6 g | +52.9% |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 40 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 91 g | 79.1 g | -13.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.013 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 16 µg | 13 µg | -18.8% |
| Toplam Kolin | 12.3 mg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.1 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.6 g | 0.5 g | -80.8% |
| Çinko | 0.03 mg | 0.39 mg | +1200.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alabaş (Kohlrabi) and Lotus Kökü.
Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has less energy per 100 g (27 kcal versus 74 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 0.03 mg and Lotus Kökü has 0.39 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alabaş (Kohlrabi) 68, Lotus Kökü 59.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.