Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
24 kcal
Score
57 / 100
Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has a higher nutrition quality score (68) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
27 vs 24(-11.1%)
Score Diff
68 vs 57(-16.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alabaş (Kohlrabi)
Higher energy
Alabaş (Kohlrabi)
Score leader
Alabaş (Kohlrabi)
Nutrient split
13 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Alabaş (Kohlrabi) and Japon patlıcanı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 27.0 kcal and Japon patlıcanı has 24.0 kcal. The difference is 3.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 68 and 57. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Alabaş (Kohlrabi) | Japon patlıcanı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.039 mg | -22.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.037 mg | +85.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.084 mg | -44.0% |
| Bakir | 0.129 mg | 0.081 mg | -37.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 62 mg | 2.2 mg | -96.5% |
| Demir | 0.4 mg | 0.24 mg | -40.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.6 g | 3 g | -16.7% |
| Fosfor | 46 mg | 25 mg | -45.7% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 3.5 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 9 mg | -62.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 6.2 g | 5.7 g | -8.1% |
| Kül | 1 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 19 mg | 14 mg | -26.3% |
| Mangan | 0.139 mg | 0.25 mg | +79.9% |
| Niasin | 0.4 mg | 0.6 mg | +50.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.165 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 350 mg | 230 mg | -34.3% |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1 g | -41.2% |
| Sodyum | 20 mg | 2 mg | -90.0% |
| Su | 91 g | 92.4 g | +1.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.013 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 16 µg | 22 µg | +37.5% |
| Toplam Kolin | 12.3 mg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.15 g | +50.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.6 g | 3.2 g | +23.1% |
| Çinko | 0.03 mg | 0.16 mg | +433.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Alabaş (Kohlrabi) and Japon patlıcanı.
Japon patlıcanı has less energy per 100 g (24 kcal versus 27 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Alabaş (Kohlrabi) has 0.03 mg and Japon patlıcanı has 0.16 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Alabaş (Kohlrabi) 68, Japon patlıcanı 57.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.