Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
109 kcal
Score
70 / 100
Oğlak Eti has a higher nutrition quality score (70) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
141 vs 109(-22.7%)
Score Diff
58 vs 70(+20.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Oğlak Eti
Higher energy
Ala balığı
Score leader
Oğlak Eti
Nutrient split
12 - 6 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ala balığı and Oğlak Eti are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ala balığı has 141.0 kcal and Oğlak Eti has 109.0 kcal. The difference is 32.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 58 and 70. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ala balığı | Oğlak Eti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 4.15 µg | 1.19 µg | -71.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.49 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.3 mg | -14.3% |
| D Vitamini | 3.9 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.7 mg | 2.83 mg | +304.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.22 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 245 mg | 180 mg | -26.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 67 mg | 13 mg | -80.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 59 mg | 57 mg | -3.4% |
| Kül | 1.22 g | 1.11 g | -9.0% |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 25 mg | 0.0% |
| Niasin | 5.38 mg | 3.76 mg | -30.1% |
| Potasyum | 361 mg | 385 mg | +6.6% |
| Protein | 19.94 g | 20.6 g | +3.3% |
| Selenyum | 12.6 µg | 8.8 µg | -30.2% |
| Sodyum | 51 mg | 86 mg | +68.6% |
| Su | 71.87 g | 75.84 g | +5.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.39 g | 0.71 g | -48.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.03 g | 1.03 g | -49.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.18 g | 2.31 g | -62.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.73 g | 0.17 g | -90.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.66 mg | 4 mg | +506.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ala balığı and Oğlak Eti.
Oğlak Eti has less energy per 100 g (109 kcal versus 141 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Ala balığı has 0.66 mg and Oğlak Eti has 4 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ala balığı 58, Oğlak Eti 70.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.