Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
215 kcal
Score
49 / 100
Ala balığı has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
141 vs 215(+52.5%)
Score Diff
58 vs 49(-15.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ala balığı
Higher energy
Kuzu pöç
Score leader
Ala balığı
Nutrient split
7 - 10 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ala balığı and Kuzu pöç are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ala balığı has 141.0 kcal and Kuzu pöç has 215.0 kcal. The difference is 74.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 58 and 49. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ala balığı | Kuzu pöç | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B12 Vitamini | 4.15 µg | 2.5 µg | -39.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.3 mg | -14.3% |
| Bakir | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 3.9 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.7 mg | 2.1 mg | +200.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 215 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.22 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 245 mg | 230 mg | -6.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 67 mg | 15 mg | -77.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 59 mg | 75 mg | +27.1% |
| Kül | 1.22 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 25 mg | 0.0% |
| Niasin | 5.38 mg | 7 mg | +30.1% |
| Potasyum | 361 mg | 280 mg | -22.4% |
| Protein | 19.94 g | 28.5 g | +42.9% |
| Selenyum | 12.6 µg | 25 µg | +98.4% |
| Sodyum | 51 mg | 70 mg | +37.3% |
| Su | 71.87 g | 57 g | -20.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.39 g | 5.5 g | +295.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.03 g | 4.8 g | +136.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.18 g | 12.5 g | +102.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.73 g | 1.2 g | -30.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.66 mg | 4 mg | +506.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ala balığı and Kuzu pöç.
Ala balığı has less energy per 100 g (141 kcal versus 215 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Ala balığı has 0.66 mg and Kuzu pöç has 4 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ala balığı 58, Kuzu pöç 49.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.