Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
74 kcal
Score
95 / 100
Kum midyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (95) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
141 vs 74(-47.5%)
Score Diff
58 vs 95(+63.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kum midyesi
Higher energy
Ala balığı
Score leader
Kum midyesi
Nutrient split
12 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ala balığı and Kum midyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ala balığı has 141.0 kcal and Kum midyesi has 74.0 kcal. The difference is 67.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 58 and 95. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ala balığı | Kum midyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 90 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.09 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 4.15 µg | 49.4 µg | +1090.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.21 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.05 mg | -85.7% |
| Bakir | — | 0.34 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 13 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 3.9 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.7 mg | 13.98 mg | +1897.1% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.22 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 245 mg | 169 mg | -31.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 67 mg | 46 mg | -31.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 2.57 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 59 mg | 34 mg | -42.4% |
| Kül | 1.22 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 18 mg | -28.0% |
| Niasin | 5.38 mg | 1.76 mg | -67.3% |
| Potasyum | 361 mg | 314 mg | -13.0% |
| Protein | 19.94 g | 12.77 g | -36.0% |
| Selenyum | 12.6 µg | 24.3 µg | +92.9% |
| Sodyum | 51 mg | 56 mg | +9.8% |
| Su | 71.87 g | 81.82 g | +13.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.39 g | 0.19 g | -86.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.03 g | 0.11 g | -94.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.18 g | 0.97 g | -84.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.73 g | 0.28 g | -83.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.66 mg | 1.37 mg | +107.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ala balığı and Kum midyesi.
Kum midyesi has less energy per 100 g (74 kcal versus 141 kcal).
For measured Demir, Ala balığı has 0.7 mg and Kum midyesi has 13.98 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ala balığı 58, Kum midyesi 95.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.