Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
97 kcal
Score
74 / 100
İskorpit has a higher nutrition quality score (74) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
141 vs 97(-31.2%)
Score Diff
58 vs 74(+27.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
İskorpit
Higher energy
Ala balığı
Score leader
İskorpit
Nutrient split
11 - 6 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ala balığı and İskorpit are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ala balığı has 141.0 kcal and İskorpit has 97.0 kcal. The difference is 44.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 58 and 74. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ala balığı | İskorpit | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B12 Vitamini | 4.15 µg | 2.5 µg | -39.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.15 mg | -57.1% |
| Bakir | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 3.9 µg | 8 µg | +105.1% |
| Demir | 0.7 mg | 0.7 mg | 0.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | 0.12 g | -76.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | — | 97 kcal | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.22 g | 0.08 g | -63.6% |
| Fosfor | 245 mg | 220 mg | -10.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 67 mg | 25 mg | -62.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 59 mg | 55 mg | -6.8% |
| Kül | 1.22 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 28 mg | +12.0% |
| Niasin | 5.38 mg | 3.5 mg | -34.9% |
| Potasyum | 361 mg | 380 mg | +5.3% |
| Protein | 19.94 g | 19.5 g | -2.2% |
| Selenyum | 12.6 µg | 45 µg | +257.1% |
| Sodyum | 51 mg | 60 mg | +17.6% |
| Su | 71.87 g | 78 g | +8.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.39 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.03 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.18 g | 1.5 g | -75.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.73 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.66 mg | 0.4 mg | -39.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ala balığı and İskorpit.
İskorpit has less energy per 100 g (97 kcal versus 141 kcal).
For measured Selenyum, Ala balığı has 12.6 µg and İskorpit has 45 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ala balığı 58, İskorpit 74.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.