Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
87 kcal
Score
61 / 100
Yengeç Eti has a higher nutrition quality score (61) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
146 vs 87(-40.4%)
Score Diff
60 vs 61(+1.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yengeç Eti
Higher energy
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı)
Score leader
Yengeç Eti
Nutrient split
9 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Yengeç Eti are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 146.0 kcal and Yengeç Eti has 87.0 kcal. The difference is 59.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 60 and 61. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) | Yengeç Eti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.4 µg | 9 µg | +275.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.45 mg | 0.18 mg | -60.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.67 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 4.2 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 0.74 mg | -7.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | 0.15 g | -71.2% |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1 mg | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.18 g | 0.17 g | -5.6% |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 229 mg | +9.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 89 mg | +304.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0.04 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 55 mg | 78 mg | +41.8% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.6 g | +33.3% |
| Magnezyum | 30 mg | 34 mg | +13.3% |
| Niasin | 8.5 mg | 2.7 mg | -68.2% |
| Potasyum | 404 mg | 329 mg | -18.6% |
| Protein | 23.1 g | 18.06 g | -21.8% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 37.4 µg | +2.5% |
| Sodyum | 39 mg | 395 mg | +912.8% |
| Su | 70.5 g | 79.22 g | +12.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | 0.22 g | -83.1% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 44 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.16 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.2 g | 1.08 g | -79.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.42 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.6 mg | 3.54 mg | +490.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Yengeç Eti.
Yengeç Eti has less energy per 100 g (87 kcal versus 146 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 39 mg and Yengeç Eti has 395 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) 60, Yengeç Eti 61.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.