Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
119 kcal
Score
89 / 100
Tavuk Ciğeri has a higher nutrition quality score (89) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
146 vs 119(-18.5%)
Score Diff
60 vs 89(+48.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tavuk Ciğeri
Higher energy
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı)
Score leader
Tavuk Ciğeri
Nutrient split
5 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Tavuk Ciğeri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 146.0 kcal and Tavuk Ciğeri has 119.0 kcal. The difference is 27.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 60 and 89. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) | Tavuk Ciğeri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 3290 µg | +8557.9% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.31 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.4 µg | 16.58 µg | +590.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 1.78 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.45 mg | 0.85 mg | +88.9% |
| Bakir | — | 0.49 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 17.9 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 4.2 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 8.99 mg | +1023.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.18 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 588 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 297 mg | +41.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 8 mg | -63.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0.73 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 55 mg | 345 mg | +527.3% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 30 mg | 19 mg | -36.7% |
| Niasin | 8.5 mg | 9.73 mg | +14.5% |
| Potasyum | 404 mg | 230 mg | -43.1% |
| Protein | 23.1 g | 16.92 g | -26.8% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 54.6 µg | +49.6% |
| Sodyum | 39 mg | 71 mg | +82.1% |
| Su | 70.5 g | 76.47 g | +8.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | 1.56 g | +20.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.18 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.2 g | 4.83 g | -7.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.29 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.6 mg | 2.67 mg | +345.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Tavuk Ciğeri.
Tavuk Ciğeri has less energy per 100 g (119 kcal versus 146 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 38 µg and Tavuk Ciğeri has 3290 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) 60, Tavuk Ciğeri 89.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.