Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
101 kcal
Score
96 / 100
Kuzu dalak has a higher nutrition quality score (96) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
146 vs 101(-30.8%)
Score Diff
60 vs 96(+60.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuzu dalak
Higher energy
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı)
Score leader
Kuzu dalak
Nutrient split
6 - 9 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Kuzu dalak are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 146.0 kcal and Kuzu dalak has 101.0 kcal. The difference is 45.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 60 and 96. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) | Kuzu dalak | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.11 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.4 µg | 6.8 µg | +183.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.44 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.45 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.38 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 42 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 4.2 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 38.5 mg | +4712.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.18 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 260 mg | +23.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 55 mg | 270 mg | +390.9% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.4 g | +16.7% |
| Magnezyum | 30 mg | 17 mg | -43.3% |
| Niasin | 8.5 mg | 6.1 mg | -28.2% |
| Potasyum | 404 mg | 375 mg | -7.2% |
| Protein | 23.1 g | 17.5 g | -24.2% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 47.3 µg | +29.6% |
| Sodyum | 39 mg | 78 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 70.5 g | 77.8 g | +10.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | 1.15 g | -11.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.62 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.2 g | 3 g | -42.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.38 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.6 mg | 2.7 mg | +350.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Kuzu dalak.
Kuzu dalak has less energy per 100 g (101 kcal versus 146 kcal).
For measured Demir, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 0.8 mg and Kuzu dalak has 38.5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) 60, Kuzu dalak 96.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.