Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has a higher nutrition quality score (60) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
146 vs 161(+10.3%)
Score Diff
60 vs 42(-30.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı)
Higher energy
Kars Kazı Eti
Score leader
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı)
Nutrient split
9 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Kars Kazı Eti are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 146.0 kcal and Kars Kazı Eti has 161.0 kcal. The difference is 15.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 60 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) | Kars Kazı Eti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.4 µg | 0.41 µg | -82.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.23 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.45 mg | 0.37 mg | -17.8% |
| D Vitamini | 4.2 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 2.52 mg | +215.0% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.18 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 270 mg | +28.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 55 mg | 84 mg | +52.7% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.12 g | -6.7% |
| Magnezyum | 30 mg | 24 mg | -20.0% |
| Niasin | 8.5 mg | 4.12 mg | -51.5% |
| Potasyum | 404 mg | 312 mg | -22.8% |
| Protein | 23.1 g | 22.65 g | -1.9% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 14.8 µg | -59.5% |
| Sodyum | 39 mg | 74 mg | +89.7% |
| Su | 70.5 g | 68.3 g | -3.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | 2.76 g | +112.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.57 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.2 g | 7.13 g | +37.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.91 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.6 mg | 2.31 mg | +285.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Kars Kazı Eti.
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has less energy per 100 g (146 kcal versus 161 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 0.6 mg and Kars Kazı Eti has 2.31 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) 60, Kars Kazı Eti 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.