Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has a higher nutrition quality score (60) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
146 vs 91(-37.7%)
Score Diff
60 vs 50(-16.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı)
Higher energy
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı)
Score leader
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı)
Nutrient split
10 - 8 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Çimçim Karides are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 146.0 kcal and Çimçim Karides has 91.0 kcal. The difference is 55.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 60 and 50. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) | Çimçim Karides | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 38 µg | 18 µg | -52.6% |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.4 µg | 1.1 µg | -54.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.45 mg | 0.1 mg | -77.8% |
| Bakir | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 4.2 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.8 mg | 0.5 mg | -37.5% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0.52 g | 0.14 g | -73.1% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0.18 g | 0.15 g | -16.7% |
| Fosfor | 210 mg | 210 mg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 52 mg | +136.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 0.2 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 55 mg | 152 mg | +176.4% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.2 g | 0.0% |
| Magnezyum | 30 mg | 37 mg | +23.3% |
| Mangan | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Niasin | 8.5 mg | 2.6 mg | -69.4% |
| Potasyum | 404 mg | 220 mg | -45.5% |
| Protein | 23.1 g | 20.1 g | -13.0% |
| Selenyum | 36.5 µg | 38 µg | +4.1% |
| Sodyum | 39 mg | 119 mg | +205.1% |
| Su | 70.5 g | 78.5 g | +11.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.2 g | 1.1 g | -78.8% |
| Çinko | 0.6 mg | 1.2 mg | +100.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) and Çimçim Karides.
Çimçim Karides has less energy per 100 g (91 kcal versus 146 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) has 39 mg and Çimçim Karides has 119 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akya Balığı (Kuzu Balığı) 60, Çimçim Karides 50.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.