Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
337 kcal
Score
66 / 100
Yıldız anason tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (66) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
418 vs 337(-19.4%)
Score Diff
29 vs 66(+127.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yıldız anason tohumu
Higher energy
Akçaağaç tohumu
Score leader
Yıldız anason tohumu
Nutrient split
6 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akçaağaç tohumu and Yıldız anason tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal and Yıldız anason tohumu has 337.0 kcal. The difference is 81.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 66. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akçaağaç tohumu | Yıldız anason tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 311 iu | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.35 mg | 0.34 mg | -2.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.29 mg | +61.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.42 mg | 0.65 mg | +54.8% |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | 0.91 mg | +7.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.4 mg | 21 mg | +775.0% |
| Demir | 4.8 mg | 36.96 mg | +670.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 11.5 g | 14.6 g | +27.0% |
| Folat DFE | 62 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 390 mg | 440 mg | +12.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 145 mg | 646 mg | +345.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 38.6 g | 50 g | +29.5% |
| Kül | 3.7 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 180 mg | 170 mg | -5.6% |
| Mangan | 2.6 mg | 2.3 mg | -11.5% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 3.06 mg | +45.7% |
| Potasyum | 650 mg | 1441 mg | +121.7% |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 17.6 g | -21.4% |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | 16 mg | +77.8% |
| Su | 18.5 g | 9.54 g | -48.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 10 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.5 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 16.8 g | 15.9 g | -5.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 5.3 mg | +65.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akçaağaç tohumu and Yıldız anason tohumu.
Yıldız anason tohumu has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 418 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Akçaağaç tohumu has 2.4 mg and Yıldız anason tohumu has 21 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akçaağaç tohumu 29, Yıldız anason tohumu 66.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.