Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
525 kcal
Score
45 / 100
Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) has a higher nutrition quality score (45) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
418 vs 525(+25.6%)
Score Diff
29 vs 45(+55.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi)
Higher energy
Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi)
Score leader
Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi)
Nutrient split
8 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akçaağaç tohumu and Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akçaağaç tohumu has 418.0 kcal and Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) has 525.0 kcal. The difference is 107.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 29 and 45. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
24 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akçaağaç tohumu | Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.35 mg | 0.85 mg | +142.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.18 mg | 0.1 mg | -44.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.42 mg | 0.25 mg | -40.5% |
| Bakir | 0.85 mg | 1.63 mg | +91.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.4 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 4.8 mg | 9.76 mg | +103.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 11.5 g | 19.5 g | +69.6% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.77 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 62 µg | 82 µg | +32.3% |
| Fosfor | 390 mg | 870 mg | +123.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 145 mg | 1438 mg | +891.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 38.6 g | 28.13 g | -27.1% |
| Kül | 3.7 g | 6.37 g | +72.2% |
| Magnezyum | 180 mg | 347 mg | +92.8% |
| Mangan | 2.6 mg | 6.71 mg | +158.1% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 0.9 mg | -57.1% |
| Potasyum | 650 mg | 719 mg | +10.6% |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 17.99 g | -19.7% |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | 26 mg | +188.9% |
| Su | 18.5 g | 5.95 g | -67.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.1 g | 4.52 g | +115.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 6.5 g | 5.98 g | -8.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 16.8 g | 41.56 g | +147.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.2 g | 28.57 g | +296.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.2 g | 2.99 g | -28.8% |
| Çinko | 3.2 mg | 7.9 mg | +146.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akçaağaç tohumu and Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi).
Akçaağaç tohumu has less energy per 100 g (418 kcal versus 525 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Akçaağaç tohumu has 145 mg and Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) has 1438 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akçaağaç tohumu 29, Haşhaş Tohumu (Mavi) 45.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.