Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
57 kcal
Score
19 / 100
Akça armut and Williams armudu have the same nutrition score (19).
Energy Diff
57 vs 57(0.0%)
Score Diff
19 vs 19(0.0%)
Higher energy
Energy is equal
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
0 - 4 (tie: 13)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armut and Williams armudu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armut has 57.0 kcal and Williams armudu has 57.0 kcal. The difference is 0.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 19 and 19. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armut | Williams armudu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 1 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.026 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.029 mg | 0.029 mg | 0.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.082 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 4.3 mg | 0.0% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.18 mg | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.1 g | 3.1 g | 0.0% |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 12 mg | 0.0% |
| Fruktoz | 6.22 g | 6.23 g | +0.2% |
| Glikoz | 2.76 g | 2.81 g | +1.8% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | 4.4 µg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 9 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15.2 g | 15.23 g | +0.2% |
| Kül | — | 0.31 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 7 mg | 0.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.048 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.161 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 116 mg | 0.0% |
| Protein | 0.36 g | 0.36 g | 0.0% |
| Sakkaroz | 0.77 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 83.8 g | 83.96 g | +0.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 7 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.14 g | 0.14 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.75 g | 9.75 g | 0.0% |
| Çinko | 0.1 mg | 0.1 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armut and Williams armudu.
The records show 57 kcal per 100 g for both foods.
For measured Glikoz, Akça armut has 2.76 g and Williams armudu has 2.81 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armut 19, Williams armudu 19.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.