Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
43 kcal
Score
60 / 100
Olallieberry has a higher nutrition quality score (60) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
57 vs 43(-24.6%)
Score Diff
19 vs 60(+215.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Olallieberry
Higher energy
Akça armut
Score leader
Olallieberry
Nutrient split
2 - 13 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armut and Olallieberry are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armut has 57.0 kcal and Olallieberry has 43.0 kcal. The difference is 14.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 19 and 60. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armut | Olallieberry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 214 iu | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.026 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.029 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.165 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 21 mg | +388.4% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.62 mg | +244.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.1 g | 5.3 g | +71.0% |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | 25 µg | +257.1% |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 22 mg | +83.3% |
| Fruktoz | 6.22 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 2.76 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | 19.8 µg | +350.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 29 mg | +222.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15.2 g | 10.15 g | -33.2% |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 20 mg | +185.7% |
| Mangan | — | 0.646 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.161 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 162 mg | +39.7% |
| Protein | 0.36 g | 1.39 g | +286.1% |
| Sakkaroz | 0.77 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 1 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 83.8 g | 88.15 g | +5.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.14 g | 0.49 g | +250.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.75 g | 4.88 g | -49.9% |
| Çinko | 0.1 mg | 0.53 mg | +430.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armut and Olallieberry.
Olallieberry has less energy per 100 g (43 kcal versus 57 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Akça armut has 0.1 mg and Olallieberry has 0.53 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armut 19, Olallieberry 60.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.