Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
50 kcal
Score
45 / 100
Muş kayısısı has a higher nutrition quality score (45) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
57 vs 50(-12.3%)
Score Diff
19 vs 45(+136.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Muş kayısısı
Higher energy
Akça armut
Score leader
Muş kayısısı
Nutrient split
4 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armut and Muş kayısısı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armut has 57.0 kcal and Muş kayısısı has 50.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 19 and 45. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armut | Muş kayısısı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 96 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | 0.03 mg | +150.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.026 mg | 0.04 mg | +53.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.029 mg | 0.054 mg | +86.2% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1094 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 10 mg | +132.6% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.39 mg | +116.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.1 g | 2 g | -35.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.89 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 23 mg | +91.7% |
| Fruktoz | 6.22 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 2.76 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | 3.3 µg | -25.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 13 mg | +44.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15.2 g | 11.8 g | -22.4% |
| Kül | — | 0.75 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 10 mg | +42.9% |
| Niasin | 0.161 mg | 0.6 mg | +272.7% |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 259 mg | +123.3% |
| Protein | 0.36 g | 1.4 g | +288.9% |
| Sakkaroz | 0.77 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 83.8 g | 85.5 g | +2.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.14 g | 0.39 g | +178.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.75 g | 9.24 g | -5.2% |
| Çinko | 0.1 mg | 0.2 mg | +100.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armut and Muş kayısısı.
Muş kayısısı has less energy per 100 g (50 kcal versus 57 kcal).
For measured Protein, Akça armut has 0.36 g and Muş kayısısı has 1.4 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armut 19, Muş kayısısı 45.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.