Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
13 / 100
Akça armut has a higher nutrition quality score (19) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
57 vs 282(+394.7%)
Score Diff
19 vs 13(-31.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Akça armut
Higher energy
Mebrum Hurması
Score leader
Akça armut
Nutrient split
1 - 18 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armut and Mebrum Hurması are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armut has 57.0 kcal and Mebrum Hurması has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 225.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 19 and 13. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armut | Mebrum Hurması | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | 0.05 mg | +316.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.026 mg | 0.06 mg | +130.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.029 mg | 0.249 mg | +758.6% |
| Bakir | — | 0.36 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 89 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 1.02 mg | +466.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.1 g | 7.5 g | +141.9% |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 62 mg | +416.7% |
| Fruktoz | 6.22 g | 31.35 g | +404.0% |
| Glikoz | 2.76 g | 32 g | +1059.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 64 mg | +611.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15.2 g | 75.03 g | +393.6% |
| Kül | — | 1.6 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 54 mg | +671.4% |
| Mangan | — | 0.298 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.161 mg | 1.61 mg | +900.0% |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 656 mg | +465.5% |
| Protein | 0.36 g | 2.45 g | +580.6% |
| Sakkaroz | 0.77 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 2 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 83.8 g | 20.53 g | -75.5% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 19 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.14 g | 0.39 g | +178.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.75 g | 63.35 g | +549.7% |
| Çinko | 0.1 mg | 0.44 mg | +340.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armut and Mebrum Hurması.
Akça armut has less energy per 100 g (57 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Glikoz, Akça armut has 2.76 g and Mebrum Hurması has 32 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armut 19, Mebrum Hurması 13.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.