Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
69 kcal
Score
18 / 100
Akça armut has a higher nutrition quality score (19) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
57 vs 69(+21.1%)
Score Diff
19 vs 18(-5.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Akça armut
Higher energy
Kokulu üzüm
Score leader
Akça armut
Nutrient split
6 - 13 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armut and Kokulu üzüm are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armut has 57.0 kcal and Kokulu üzüm has 69.0 kcal. The difference is 12.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 19 and 18. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armut | Kokulu üzüm | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 3 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | 0.069 mg | +475.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.026 mg | 0.07 mg | +169.2% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.029 mg | 0.086 mg | +196.6% |
| Bakir | — | 0.121 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 30 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 4 mg | -7.0% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.29 mg | +61.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.1 g | 0.9 g | -71.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 69 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | 4 µg | -42.9% |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 20 mg | +66.7% |
| Fruktoz | 6.22 g | 8.1 g | +30.2% |
| Glikoz | 2.76 g | 7.21 g | +161.2% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | 14.6 µg | +231.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 10 mg | +11.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15.2 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 18.1 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 72 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 7 mg | 0.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.071 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.161 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 191 mg | +64.7% |
| Protein | 0.36 g | 0.72 g | +100.0% |
| Sakkaroz | 0.77 g | 0.17 g | -77.9% |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 83.8 g | 81.3 g | -3.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.14 g | 0.16 g | +14.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.75 g | 15.48 g | +58.8% |
| Çinko | 0.1 mg | 0.07 mg | -30.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armut and Kokulu üzüm.
Akça armut has less energy per 100 g (57 kcal versus 69 kcal).
For measured B1 Vitamini (Tiamin), Akça armut has 0.012 mg and Kokulu üzüm has 0.069 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armut 19, Kokulu üzüm 18.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.