Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
67.3 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Gac meyvesi has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
57 vs 67.3(+18.1%)
Score Diff
19 vs 42(+121.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Gac meyvesi
Higher energy
Gac meyvesi
Score leader
Gac meyvesi
Nutrient split
4 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armut and Gac meyvesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armut has 57.0 kcal and Gac meyvesi has 67.3 kcal. The difference is 10.3 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 19 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armut | Gac meyvesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 1458 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.012 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.026 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.029 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 17500 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 40 mg | +830.2% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.6 mg | +233.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.1 g | 1.6 g | -48.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 7.6 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 7 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 12 mg | 30 mg | +150.0% |
| Fruktoz | 6.22 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 2.76 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 26 mg | +188.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15.2 g | 10.5 g | -30.9% |
| Kül | — | 0.8 g | — |
| Likopen | — | 222800 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 15 mg | +114.3% |
| Niasin | 0.161 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 240 mg | +106.9% |
| Protein | 0.36 g | 1.6 g | +344.4% |
| Sakkaroz | 0.77 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | 3 mg | +200.0% |
| Su | 83.8 g | 80 g | -4.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.65 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.82 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.14 g | 2.1 g | +1400.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.48 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 9.75 g | 6.5 g | -33.3% |
| Çinko | 0.1 mg | 0.22 mg | +120.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armut and Gac meyvesi.
Akça armut has less energy per 100 g (57 kcal versus 67.3 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Akça armut has 0.14 g and Gac meyvesi has 2.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armut 19, Gac meyvesi 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.