Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
53 kcal
Score
36 / 100
Yuzu Meyvesi has a higher nutrition quality score (36) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
47 vs 53(+12.8%)
Score Diff
22 vs 36(+63.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yuzu Meyvesi
Higher energy
Yuzu Meyvesi
Score leader
Yuzu Meyvesi
Nutrient split
4 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armudu and Yuzu Meyvesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal and Yuzu Meyvesi has 53.0 kcal. The difference is 6.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 36. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
14 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armudu | Yuzu Meyvesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 12 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.07 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.028 mg | 0.06 mg | +114.3% |
| Bakir | 0.082 mg | 0.04 mg | -51.2% |
| Beta Karoten | 14 µg | 140 µg | +900.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 90 mg | +1993.0% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.1 mg | -44.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 3.7 g | +32.1% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.7 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 47 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 19 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 11 mg | 18 mg | +63.6% |
| Fruktoz | 6.2 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 2.8 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 23 mg | +155.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.4 g | 11.9 g | -4.0% |
| Kül | — | 0.7 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 11 mg | +57.1% |
| Malik asit | 250 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.3 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 210 mg | +81.0% |
| Protein | 0.38 g | 0.8 g | +110.5% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Sitrik asit | — | 4500 mg | — |
| Sodyum | — | 2 mg | — |
| Su | 85.5 g | 86.5 g | +1.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.12 g | 0.1 g | -16.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 5.2 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 0.1 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armudu and Yuzu Meyvesi.
Akça armudu has less energy per 100 g (47 kcal versus 53 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Akça armudu has 4.3 mg and Yuzu Meyvesi has 90 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armudu 22, Yuzu Meyvesi 36.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.