Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
54 kcal
Score
57 / 100
Üvez meyvesi has a higher nutrition quality score (57) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
47 vs 54(+14.9%)
Score Diff
22 vs 57(+159.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Üvez meyvesi
Higher energy
Üvez meyvesi
Score leader
Üvez meyvesi
Nutrient split
1 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armudu and Üvez meyvesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal and Üvez meyvesi has 54.0 kcal. The difference is 7.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 57. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armudu | Üvez meyvesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 100 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.028 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.082 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 14 µg | 1200 µg | +8471.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 45 mg | +946.5% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.9 mg | +400.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 5.1 g | +82.1% |
| Enerji | — | 226 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 47 kcal | 54 kcal | +14.9% |
| Fosfor | 11 mg | 32 mg | +190.9% |
| Fruktoz | 6.2 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 2.8 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 38 mg | +322.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.4 g | 14.2 g | +14.5% |
| Kül | — | 0.8 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 24 mg | +242.9% |
| Malik asit | 250 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.5 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 280 mg | +141.4% |
| Protein | 0.38 g | 1.4 g | +268.4% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | — | 2 mg | — |
| Su | 85.5 g | 78.5 g | -8.2% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 18 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.12 g | 0.4 g | +233.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 6.5 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 0.25 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armudu and Üvez meyvesi.
Akça armudu has less energy per 100 g (47 kcal versus 54 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Akça armudu has 14 µg and Üvez meyvesi has 1200 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armudu 22, Üvez meyvesi 57.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.