Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
69 kcal
Score
17 / 100
Akça armudu has a higher nutrition quality score (22) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
47 vs 69(+46.8%)
Score Diff
22 vs 17(-22.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Akça armudu
Higher energy
Siyah üzüm
Score leader
Akça armudu
Nutrient split
3 - 12 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armudu and Siyah üzüm are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal and Siyah üzüm has 69.0 kcal. The difference is 22.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 17. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armudu | Siyah üzüm | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.069 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.07 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.028 mg | 0.086 mg | +207.1% |
| Bakir | 0.082 mg | 0.127 mg | +54.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 14 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 3.2 mg | -25.6% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.36 mg | +100.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 0.9 g | -67.9% |
| Enerji | — | 288 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 47 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 11 mg | 20 mg | +81.8% |
| Fruktoz | 6.2 g | 8.1 g | +30.6% |
| Glikoz | 2.8 g | 7.4 g | +164.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | 14.6 µg | +231.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 10 mg | +11.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.4 g | 18.1 g | +46.0% |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 7 mg | 0.0% |
| Malik asit | 250 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | — | 0.071 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 191 mg | +64.7% |
| Protein | 0.38 g | 0.72 g | +89.5% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Su | 85.5 g | 80.5 g | -5.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.12 g | 0.16 g | +33.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 15.5 g | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armudu and Siyah üzüm.
Akça armudu has less energy per 100 g (47 kcal versus 69 kcal).
For measured K Vitamini (filokinon), Akça armudu has 4.4 µg and Siyah üzüm has 14.6 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armudu 22, Siyah üzüm 17.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.