Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
51 kcal
Score
44 / 100
Şekerpare kayısı has a higher nutrition quality score (44) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
47 vs 51(+8.5%)
Score Diff
22 vs 44(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Şekerpare kayısı
Higher energy
Şekerpare kayısı
Score leader
Şekerpare kayısı
Nutrient split
6 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armudu and Şekerpare kayısı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal and Şekerpare kayısı has 51.0 kcal. The difference is 4.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 44. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armudu | Şekerpare kayısı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 96 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.028 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.082 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 14 µg | 1094 µg | +7714.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 10 mg | +132.6% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.39 mg | +116.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 2.1 g | -25.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.89 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 47 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 9 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 11 mg | 23 mg | +109.1% |
| Fruktoz | 6.2 g | 0.94 g | -84.8% |
| Glikoz | 2.8 g | 2.37 g | -15.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | 3.3 µg | -25.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 13 mg | +44.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.4 g | 12.2 g | -1.6% |
| Kül | — | 0.71 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 10 mg | +42.9% |
| Malik asit | 250 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.6 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 259 mg | +123.3% |
| Protein | 0.38 g | 1.4 g | +268.4% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.2 g | 5.87 g | +389.2% |
| Su | 85.5 g | 85.3 g | -0.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.12 g | 0.39 g | +225.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 9.24 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 0.18 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armudu and Şekerpare kayısı.
Akça armudu has less energy per 100 g (47 kcal versus 51 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Akça armudu has 14 µg and Şekerpare kayısı has 1094 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armudu 22, Şekerpare kayısı 44.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.