Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
53 kcal
Score
35 / 100
Satsuma Mandalina has a higher nutrition quality score (35) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
47 vs 53(+12.8%)
Score Diff
22 vs 35(+59.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Satsuma Mandalina
Higher energy
Satsuma Mandalina
Score leader
Satsuma Mandalina
Nutrient split
6 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armudu and Satsuma Mandalina are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal and Satsuma Mandalina has 53.0 kcal. The difference is 6.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 35. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armudu | Satsuma Mandalina | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 34 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.058 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.028 mg | 0.078 mg | +178.6% |
| Bakir | 0.082 mg | 0.042 mg | -48.8% |
| Beta Karoten | 14 µg | 155 µg | +1007.1% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 407 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 26.7 mg | +520.9% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.15 mg | -16.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 1.8 g | -35.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 47 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 11 mg | 20 mg | +81.8% |
| Fruktoz | 6.2 g | 2.4 g | -61.3% |
| Glikoz | 2.8 g | 2.13 g | -23.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 37 mg | +311.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.4 g | 13.34 g | +7.6% |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 12 mg | +71.4% |
| Malik asit | 250 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 166 mg | +43.1% |
| Protein | 0.38 g | 0.81 g | +113.2% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.2 g | 6.05 g | +404.2% |
| Sodyum | — | 2 mg | — |
| Su | 85.5 g | 85.17 g | -0.4% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 16 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.12 g | 0.31 g | +158.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 10.58 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 0.07 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armudu and Satsuma Mandalina.
Akça armudu has less energy per 100 g (47 kcal versus 53 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Akça armudu has 14 µg and Satsuma Mandalina has 155 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armudu 22, Satsuma Mandalina 35.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.