Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
25 kcal
Score
51 / 100
Pepino kavunu has a higher nutrition quality score (51) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
47 vs 25(-46.8%)
Score Diff
22 vs 51(+131.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pepino kavunu
Higher energy
Akça armudu
Score leader
Pepino kavunu
Nutrient split
3 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armudu and Pepino kavunu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal and Pepino kavunu has 25.0 kcal. The difference is 22.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 51. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
12 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armudu | Pepino kavunu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 10 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.02 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.028 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.082 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 14 µg | 120 µg | +757.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 29 mg | +574.4% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.3 mg | +66.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 1.4 g | -50.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 47 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 11 mg | 13 mg | +18.2% |
| Fruktoz | 6.2 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 2.8 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 12 mg | +33.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.4 g | 5.8 g | -53.2% |
| Kül | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 8 mg | +14.3% |
| Malik asit | 250 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.45 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 135 mg | +16.4% |
| Protein | 0.38 g | 0.6 g | +57.9% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | — | 2 mg | — |
| Su | 85.5 g | 92.5 g | +8.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.02 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 9 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.12 g | 0.1 g | -16.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 4.2 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 0.1 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armudu and Pepino kavunu.
Pepino kavunu has less energy per 100 g (25 kcal versus 47 kcal).
For measured Beta Karoten, Akça armudu has 14 µg and Pepino kavunu has 120 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armudu 22, Pepino kavunu 51.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.