Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
58 kcal
Score
48 / 100
Marula has a higher nutrition quality score (48) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
47 vs 58(+23.4%)
Score Diff
22 vs 48(+118.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Marula
Higher energy
Marula
Score leader
Marula
Nutrient split
3 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akça armudu and Marula are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akça armudu has 47.0 kcal and Marula has 58.0 kcal. The difference is 11.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 48. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akça armudu | Marula | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.028 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.082 mg | 0.08 mg | -2.4% |
| Beta Karoten | 14 µg | 35 µg | +150.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 4.3 mg | 194 mg | +4411.6% |
| Demir | 0.18 mg | 0.4 mg | +122.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 2.1 g | -25.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 47 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 11 mg | 20 mg | +81.8% |
| Fruktoz | 6.2 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 2.8 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.4 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 9 mg | 12 mg | +33.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 12.4 g | 13.7 g | +10.5% |
| Kül | — | 0.6 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 7 mg | 25 mg | +257.1% |
| Malik asit | 250 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.22 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 116 mg | 310 mg | +167.2% |
| Protein | 0.38 g | 0.5 g | +31.6% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | — | 4 mg | — |
| Su | 85.5 g | 85 g | -0.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.12 g | 0.2 g | +66.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 9.2 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 0.12 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akça armudu and Marula.
Akça armudu has less energy per 100 g (47 kcal versus 58 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Akça armudu has 4.3 mg and Marula has 194 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akça armudu 22, Marula 48.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.