Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
425 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Furikake has a higher nutrition quality score (29) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
175 vs 425(+142.9%)
Score Diff
27 vs 29(+7.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Furikake
Higher energy
Furikake
Score leader
Furikake
Nutrient split
4 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akasya lifi and Furikake are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akasya lifi has 175.0 kcal and Furikake has 425.0 kcal. The difference is 250.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akasya lifi | Furikake | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 145 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.28 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.36 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.32 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.15 mg | 0.85 mg | +466.7% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 7.8 mg | +550.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 85 g | 9.4 g | -88.9% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.6 mg | — |
| Enerji | 732 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 175 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 88 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 35 mg | 420 mg | +1100.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 950 mg | 740 mg | -22.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 85 g | 33.2 g | -60.9% |
| Kül | 3.3 g | 14.8 g | +348.5% |
| Magnezyum | 110 mg | 195 mg | +77.3% |
| Mangan | 0.2 mg | 1.45 mg | +625.0% |
| Niasin | — | 4.8 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 480 mg | 580 mg | +20.8% |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 24.5 g | +1066.7% |
| Selenyum | — | 18.6 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 85 mg | 3850 mg | +4429.4% |
| Su | 9.5 g | 4.3 g | -54.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.02 g | 3.4 g | +16900.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 8.6 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 22.8 g | +22700.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 9.8 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | 13.5 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.4 mg | 3.4 mg | +750.0% |
| Çözünmeyen lif | 0.5 g | — | — |
| Çözünür lif | 84.5 g | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akasya lifi and Furikake.
Akasya lifi has less energy per 100 g (175 kcal versus 425 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Akasya lifi has 0.1 g and Furikake has 22.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akasya lifi 27, Furikake 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.