Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
21 kcal
Score
25 / 100
Nar Sirkesi has a higher nutrition quality score (25) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
304 vs 21(-93.1%)
Score Diff
2 vs 25(+1150.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Nar Sirkesi
Higher energy
Akasya Balı
Score leader
Nar Sirkesi
Nutrient split
10 - 8 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akasya Balı and Nar Sirkesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akasya Balı has 304.0 kcal and Nar Sirkesi has 21.0 kcal. The difference is 283.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 2 and 25. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akasya Balı | Nar Sirkesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.024 mg | 0.02 mg | -16.7% |
| Bakir | 0.036 mg | 0.02 mg | -44.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.5 mg | 0.8 mg | +60.0% |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | 0.2 mg | -52.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.2 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Folat DFE | 2 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 4 mg | 8 mg | +100.0% |
| Fruktoz | 43.5 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 29.8 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 7 mg | +16.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 82.4 g | 0.93 g | -98.9% |
| Kül | 0.2 g | 0.22 g | +10.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 4 mg | +100.0% |
| Maltoz | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 0.08 mg | 0.05 mg | -37.5% |
| Niasin | 0.12 mg | 0.08 mg | -33.3% |
| Potasyum | 52 mg | 73 mg | +40.4% |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.1 g | -66.7% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.9 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 0.8 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 4.5 mg | +12.5% |
| Su | 17.1 g | 94.6 g | +453.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 82.1 g | 0.45 g | -99.5% |
| Çinko | 0.22 mg | 0.05 mg | -77.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akasya Balı and Nar Sirkesi.
Nar Sirkesi has less energy per 100 g (21 kcal versus 304 kcal).
For measured Su, Akasya Balı has 17.1 g and Nar Sirkesi has 94.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akasya Balı 2, Nar Sirkesi 25.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.