Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
304 kcal
Score
2 / 100
Akasya Balı and Ihlamur Balı have the same nutrition score (2).
Energy Diff
304 vs 304(0.0%)
Score Diff
2 vs 2(0.0%)
Higher energy
Energy is equal
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
2 - 3 (tie: 20)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akasya Balı and Ihlamur Balı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akasya Balı has 304.0 kcal and Ihlamur Balı has 304.0 kcal. The difference is 0.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 2 and 2. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
25 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akasya Balı | Ihlamur Balı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.038 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.024 mg | 0.024 mg | 0.0% |
| Bakir | 0.036 mg | 0.036 mg | 0.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.5 mg | 0.5 mg | 0.0% |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | 0.42 mg | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.2 g | 0.2 g | 0.0% |
| Folat DFE | 2 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 4 mg | 4 mg | 0.0% |
| Fruktoz | 43.5 g | 39.5 g | -9.2% |
| Glikoz | 29.8 g | 34 g | +14.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 6 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 82.4 g | 82.4 g | 0.0% |
| Kül | 0.2 g | 0.2 g | 0.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 2 mg | 0.0% |
| Maltoz | 2.1 g | 5.8 g | +176.2% |
| Mangan | 0.08 mg | 0.08 mg | 0.0% |
| Niasin | 0.12 mg | 0.12 mg | 0.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.068 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 52 mg | 52 mg | 0.0% |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.3 g | 0.0% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.9 g | 1.5 g | -21.1% |
| Selenyum | 0.8 µg | 0.8 µg | 0.0% |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 4 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 17.1 g | 17.1 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 2 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 82.1 g | 82.12 g | +0.0% |
| Çinko | 0.22 mg | 0.22 mg | 0.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akasya Balı and Ihlamur Balı.
The records show 304 kcal per 100 g for both foods.
For measured Maltoz, Akasya Balı has 2.1 g and Ihlamur Balı has 5.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akasya Balı 2, Ihlamur Balı 2.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.