Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
19 kcal
Score
45 / 100
Enginar Sirkesi has a higher nutrition quality score (45) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
304 vs 19(-93.8%)
Score Diff
2 vs 45(+2150.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Enginar Sirkesi
Higher energy
Akasya Balı
Score leader
Enginar Sirkesi
Nutrient split
8 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akasya Balı and Enginar Sirkesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akasya Balı has 304.0 kcal and Enginar Sirkesi has 19.0 kcal. The difference is 285.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 2 and 45. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akasya Balı | Enginar Sirkesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.01 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.02 mg | -47.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.024 mg | 0.03 mg | +25.0% |
| Bakir | 0.036 mg | 0.03 mg | -16.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.5 mg | 1.2 mg | +140.0% |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | 0.35 mg | -16.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.2 g | 0.1 g | -50.0% |
| Enerji | — | 79.5 kj | — |
| Folat DFE | 2 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 4 mg | 10 mg | +150.0% |
| Fruktoz | 43.5 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 29.8 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 12 mg | +100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 82.4 g | 0.9 g | -98.9% |
| Kül | 0.2 g | 0.3 g | +50.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 8 mg | +300.0% |
| Maltoz | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 0.08 mg | 0.06 mg | -25.0% |
| Niasin | 0.12 mg | 0.15 mg | +25.0% |
| Potasyum | 52 mg | 85 mg | +63.5% |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.4 g | +33.3% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.9 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 0.8 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 5 mg | +25.0% |
| Su | 17.1 g | 94.6 g | +453.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 6 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 82.1 g | 0.4 g | -99.5% |
| Çinko | 0.22 mg | 0.12 mg | -45.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akasya Balı and Enginar Sirkesi.
Enginar Sirkesi has less energy per 100 g (19 kcal versus 304 kcal).
For measured Su, Akasya Balı has 17.1 g and Enginar Sirkesi has 94.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akasya Balı 2, Enginar Sirkesi 45.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.