Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
19.5 kcal
Score
40 / 100
Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) has a higher nutrition quality score (40) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
304 vs 19.5(-93.6%)
Score Diff
2 vs 40(+1900.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı)
Higher energy
Akasya Balı
Score leader
Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı)
Nutrient split
9 - 9 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Akasya Balı and Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Akasya Balı has 304.0 kcal and Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) has 19.5 kcal. The difference is 284.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 2 and 40. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Akasya Balı | Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.006 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.038 mg | 0.012 mg | -68.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.024 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.036 mg | 0.04 mg | +11.1% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.5 mg | 1.8 mg | +260.0% |
| Demir | 0.42 mg | 0.25 mg | -40.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.2 g | 0.1 g | -50.0% |
| Folat DFE | 2 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 4 mg | 7.2 mg | +80.0% |
| Fruktoz | 43.5 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 29.8 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 6 mg | 11 mg | +83.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 82.4 g | 0.85 g | -99.0% |
| Kül | 0.2 g | 0.35 g | +75.0% |
| Magnezyum | 2 mg | 6.5 mg | +225.0% |
| Malik asit | — | 65 mg | — |
| Maltoz | 2.1 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 0.08 mg | 0.07 mg | -12.5% |
| Niasin | 0.12 mg | 0.11 mg | -8.3% |
| Potasyum | 52 mg | 88 mg | +69.2% |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.15 g | -50.0% |
| Sakkaroz | 1.9 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 0.8 µg | — | — |
| Sitrik asit | — | 18 mg | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 4 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 17.1 g | 95.2 g | +456.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0.02 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 82.1 g | 0.45 g | -99.5% |
| Çinko | 0.22 mg | 0.08 mg | -63.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Akasya Balı and Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı).
Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) has less energy per 100 g (19.5 kcal versus 304 kcal).
For measured Su, Akasya Balı has 17.1 g and Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) has 95.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Akasya Balı 2, Alıç Sirkesi (Ev Yapımı) 40.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.