Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
158 kcal
Score
57 / 100
Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has a higher nutrition quality score (57) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
98 vs 158(+61.2%)
Score Diff
35 vs 57(+62.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Higher energy
Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Score leader
Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü)
Nutrient split
6 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ajvar and Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ajvar has 98.0 kcal and Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 158.0 kcal. The difference is 60.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 35 and 57. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ajvar | Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 78 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.12 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.19 mg | 0.15 mg | -21.1% |
| Bakir | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 935 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 62.4 mg | 22.4 mg | -64.1% |
| Demir | 0.85 mg | 4.2 mg | +394.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.6 g | 1.8 g | -30.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.75 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 29 mg | 45 mg | +55.2% |
| Kalsiyum | 19 mg | 185 mg | +873.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 8.35 g | 36.5 g | +337.1% |
| Kül | 1.6 g | 3.8 g | +137.5% |
| Magnezyum | 15 mg | 62 mg | +313.3% |
| Malik asit | — | 4800 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.88 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 235 mg | 580 mg | +146.8% |
| Protein | 1.45 g | 2.1 g | +44.8% |
| Sitrik asit | — | 950 mg | — |
| Sodyum | 490 mg | 48 mg | -90.2% |
| Su | 81.8 g | 52.5 g | -35.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.72 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 21 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.85 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 5.8 g | 0.6 g | -89.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.95 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 4.9 g | 18.4 g | +275.5% |
| Çinko | 0.28 mg | 1.1 mg | +292.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ajvar and Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü).
Ajvar has less energy per 100 g (98 kcal versus 158 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Ajvar has 19 mg and Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü) has 185 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ajvar 35, Sumak Ekşisi (Organik/Köy Usulü) 57.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.